|
by Mildred Tickler, RN, BA
Whenever two people live or work closely together, there is bound to
be conflict. In fact, the
more closely the two lives are intertwined, the more likely the friction
and the hotter the sparks. This conflict is inevitable because no two
people ever came out of the same exact background. There will be differences
in ideas and preferences, political ideation, religious convictions, and
personality styles. And with all of these differences, sooner or later
there will be disagreement.
This kind of conflict is normal and to be expected. It occurs in the
most healthy families and in the work places of the most well-adjusted.
Being in conflict with others is not a sin, but how we handle ourselves
when conflict arises might consist of sinful behavior. We are instructed
in Psalm 4:4 to be angry and sin not.
Since conflict is normal and unavoidable, it is necessary for all of
us to learn to deal with it. If we don't, we are headed for ulcers-at
the least-and quite possibly big-time trouble. In Matthew 5 we are instructed
to settle our differences by going directly to the person with whom we
have our grievance. Too often we feel intimidated by our adversaries and
instead of dealing with them directly, we tell others how angry or upset
we are. The conflict handled this way often gets blown out of proportion
and small differences become irreconcilable.
If we do get involved in direct confrontation, the common approach is
for one person to attack. This results in hurt feelings in the other person
which causes him/her to put up the defenses and fight back. When both
parties engage in this negative approach, not only is there little likelihood
of settling the dispute, but feelings will likely be hurt and the rift
in the relationship will widen. There is a better way to manage conflict.
First we need to understand some basic principles.
We all have a need to feel successful at what we are doing. This need
is unique and personal for each individual. In my desire to feel successful
as a wife and mother, my list of needs may differ from the list of another
woman with an equal desire to be successful in the wife and motherhood
business.
When someone behaves in a way which frustrates one of my needs, we will
have conflict. If one of my needs is to have my kitchen reasonably neat
between meals, and my husband and/or children eat frequent between-meal
snacks and leave their mess, my need will be frustrated and I will have
very strong feelings.
I can handle this situation in one of three ways. I can choose to CHANGE
MYSELF. I can decide it is all right for them to do this and I will cheerfully
and silently clean up after my family forever. The key word is "cheerfully."
This must be a decision I am genuinely happy with and not just my way
of avoiding conflict, because denying conflict is as dangerous as storing
gunpowder next to the furnace.
My second choice is to CHANGE THE ENVIRONMENT. If I arrange for no snack
food to be available for my family members, they will be unable to make
a mess. This would take care of my immediate need, but would more than
likely result in some more serious family conflicts.
My third alternative is to attempt to CHANGE THE OTHER PERSON(S) involved.
Since I have no real ability to change anyone other than myself, I must
find a way to motivate or promote the desire for change in the others.
I can only do this by some very open communication.
If I anticipate that my need is in conflict with their need(s), I can
anticipate that this will not be just a one-way communication. An interchange
where conflicting needs are being dealt with could be noisy and uncomfortable.
It could be we will collude to avoid this unpleasantness.
We all avoid conflict at times for a variety of reasons. Sometimes it
is because we fear the other person's guns will be bigger than our guns.
We feel we would be better off to live with the existing situation than
go to war because we may end up hurt worse than we are now. Sometimes
we avoid fighting because we have been denying our anger for so long we
feel it will be like Pandora's box-if we begin to let out a little it
will pour out so fast we won't be able to control it or ourselves. Sometimes
we avoid fighting because we think it isn't nice, polite-and we're sure
it isn't Christian. But whatever the reasons we try to avoid fighting,
there are some issues that can't be evaded.
In a fair fight, there are some rules to observe; the conflict must be
conducted in an orderly fashion. I encourage fighting by appointment only.
No one who is ill, overtired, overwrought with anxiety over another matter,
or under the influence of drugs or alcohol can engage in fair fighting.
So I might announce to my family that I have an issue to be discussed
and we will deal with it at the conclusion of the evening meal.
Another rule for fair fighting is to meet on neutral turf. In this conflict,
it will be best if we leave the kitchen (where I probably have more power)
and go to the living room. We will not go to the garage (where the power
lies with my husband) or the family room with the stereo blasting with
all decibels.
The agreed-upon time has arrived and we are all in the agreed-upon place.
The interval between announcement of need for discussion and the actual
fight time has given me an opportunity for reflection. Just what is the
issue? What need of mine is being conflicted? How important is that to
me, really? How do I feel about this need not being met? How afraid am
I of this fight? Is there a danger I might collude with my family to duck
the issue? What changes do I want to see? It is not fair to pick a fight
just for the sake of making noise. I must have a solution to propose.
I must also be prepared to compromise on that solution.
As problem owner, it is up to me to present my grievance. I must own
my feelings and describe the situation that evokes these feelings. I may
not preach, harangue, or suggest solutions yet. My opening remarks might
go like this, "I'm disappointed that my desire for neatness is not
shared, and I'm displeased and disgusted when I have to clean up after
you in the kitchen." Now my family has a turn, but they may not respond
to my feelings yet. First they must let me know they have heard me. I
need to hear them reflect what I said. It can be in their own words but
they must have my meaning. "You're just mad because we drank all
the milk before supper," does not reflect my sentiment at all. We
cannot proceed until I am assured they have "heard" me.
It is now their turn to respond with their needs and feelings. And it's
my turn to listen and reflect what I hear them saying. This approach slows
things down considerably until you get the hang of it. Once both sides
of this grievance are aired, declare a break in the action.
This is a good time for each of us to review. Now that I have heard both
sides of the issue, do I still feel as strongly as I did? Is it still
worth fighting about? What have I learned about the needs and feelings
of the other(s)? This break may take from three seconds to several hours-depending
on the issue and intensity of feelings. I must be careful not to postpone
resumption of the battle too long or a resolution may never be reached.
After I have presented my proposed solution, the other(s) are invited
to suggest modifications until we all agree on a workable solution. We
will need to set a date and time to review this trial solution. Write
the appointment down so it is sure to be brought up again.
No issue is ever resolved until both parties agree it is resolved. And
once it is resolved, it may never be brought up again unless it comes
up as a fight issue at a later time. But it cannot be brought out of the
historical museum to be used as an exhibit in another fight.
Some other general rules include no name-calling. "Stupid,"
"lazy," and "incompetent" tend to incite feelings
totally irrelevant to the issue at hand.
Stay focused on the issue. No fair introducing other grievances. Save
them for their own fight.
Conflicts will continue to arise-at home, at work-in any intimate relationship.
They do not have to be divisive and destructive. When you deal with conflicts
using the fair fighting rules, you will find your fights actually promote
intimacy and growth rather than pain and separation.
|


TODAY: Understanding Assertiveness
Mildred (Milly) Tickfer, was an
employee of Pine Rest for 25 years. She has also written on Communication
Skills, Depression in Women, Spouse Abuse, and Children of Divorce and
in 1988 published a four-part children's story. Her book, Healing the
Hurt for teenagers whose parents are divorced, was released in 1984.
|